Private wells and septic systems in rural Texas must be evaluated as one property utility system. Before closing, a buyer needs to establish who controls the groundwater, whether every well and on-site sewage facility is lawfully documented, whether the well can provide usable water under sustained demand, and whether the septic system can handle the dwelling as it exists today.
Water flowing from a faucet proves only that the pump and pressure system worked at that moment. A flushing toilet does not establish septic capacity, drainfield condition, permit status, or safe separation from the well. The records, site layout, laboratory results, system performance, and intended future use must agree before the property can be evaluated with confidence.
Questions That Must Be Resolved Before Closing
- Water ownership and access: Does the property include the groundwater rights, well ownership, access rights, and agreements needed to continue receiving water?
- Water quantity: Can the well sustain household demand after the pressure tank has been drawn down?
- Water quality: Do current laboratory results support the intended drinking and household uses?
- Wastewater legality and performance: Is the on-site sewage facility, commonly called an OSSF in Texas records, permitted, exempt, or lawfully grandfathered, and is it functioning without surface discharge or backup?
- Future use: Can the current systems support planned bedrooms, guest quarters, livestock, irrigation, workshops, recreational vehicle connections, subdivision, or additional structures?
Water Disclosure Effective July 2026
Texas Real Estate Commission Form 61-0, Seller’s Disclosure About Groundwater and Surface Water Rights, has an effective date of July 1, 2026. The form addresses seller-known information about groundwater districts, active and inactive wells, shared or off-property wells, well registrations and permits, groundwater rights that may have been severed or leased, and associated surface-water rights.[Water disclosure]
The form states that it reflects the seller’s knowledge and does not replace inspections or warranties. A buyer should not treat a checked box, an “unknown” response, or a missing attachment as proof that no water-rights issue exists.
Identify the Regulating Authorities for the Parcel
Texas does not use one statewide office for every residential well and septic question. The relevant authority may change at the parcel line. A rural mailing address, an unincorporated location, or placement within a city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction does not identify the responsible office by itself.
Find the Groundwater Conservation District
A private domestic well generally does not require registration with the state solely because it exists. A Groundwater Conservation District, or GCD, may impose registration, permitting, spacing, production, well-location, or acreage rules within its jurisdiction. Texas also has no single statewide minimum-acreage rule for drilling a private well; county, city, district, subdivision, or other local restrictions may still apply.[Well jurisdiction]
Confirm the district boundary using the property address and legal description. Then ask the district whether the existing well is registered, exempt, permitted, restricted to domestic use, shared with another tract, or affected by subdivision rules. A nearby property may fall under a different district or no district at all.
Find the OSSF Permitting Authority
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality establishes statewide OSSF requirements, but it is not the permitting authority in most locations. The authorized agent may be a county, city, public health district, river authority, or another local governmental body. TCEQ handles permitting where no local program has been authorized. Local programs may adopt requirements that are stricter than the state minimums.[Permit authority]
Search by county, then confirm that the identified office has jurisdiction over the parcel. Do not assume that the county appraisal district, county clerk, municipal utility district, homeowners association, or listing agent maintains the controlling OSSF record.
Request the Records Before Ordering Tests
Records should be collected early in the contract period. They identify what was installed, where it was approved, what use it was designed to support, and which questions require field verification.
| Record | What to Verify | Concern if Missing |
|---|---|---|
| State of Texas Water Well Report | Drill date, depth, casing, completion, intended use, driller, and location | The physical well may be difficult to match to its construction history |
| GCD registration or permit | District status, permit number, exemptions, use limits, and well identity | The well may not comply with current district records or conditions |
| Pump and treatment records | Pump age, repairs, pressure equipment, softener, filtration, chlorination, and service history | Deferred maintenance or treatment dependence may remain hidden |
| Shared-well documents | Ownership, beneficiaries, access, electricity, testing, repairs, and replacement costs | Continued water access may depend on an informal arrangement |
| OSSF permit and approved plan | System type, tank size, disposal method, design flow, approved location, and final authorization | The installed system may not match the approved design |
| As-built drawing or site plan | Tank, drainfield, spray area, lines, easements, wells, structures, and property boundaries | Inspection and future construction decisions become less reliable |
| Septic service records | Pumping, alarms, repairs, inspections, testing reports, and maintenance-provider visits | Mechanical or disposal problems may have been recurring |
| Survey and title documents | Property lines, easements, shared facilities, access routes, and water-rights exceptions | A system may serve or occupy land outside the buyer’s control |
Locate a Missing Well Report
The search method depends partly on the drill date. Texas well reports from 2003 forward are generally stored in the Submitted Drillers Reports system. Older paper reports were scanned into a separate TCEQ viewer. Searches may require the former owner’s name, county, legal description, approximate drill date, driller, or well depth because older rural addresses may not match the current 911 address.[Well records]
A map point near the property is only a candidate record. Match the report to the physical casing, owner history, construction details, proposed use, and known location. Coordinates in older or manually entered records may be imprecise.
Confirm Water Rights, Well Ownership, and Access
A well on the parcel does not by itself establish that the buyer will acquire every right needed to use it. Groundwater rights may have been severed from the surface estate, sold, leased, reserved, or made subject to another agreement. A well may also be owned or operated for several beneficiaries, or the house may receive water from a well located on neighboring land.
Shared and Off-Property Wells
A recorded or professionally reviewed agreement should address:
- Ownership of the well, pump, storage equipment, electrical service, and water lines
- The properties and users entitled to receive water
- Recorded access for inspection, repair, replacement, and emergency work
- Allocation of electricity, routine maintenance, laboratory testing, and major repair costs
- Water allocation during drought, pump failure, or limited recovery
- Restrictions on irrigation, livestock use, new homes, accessory dwellings, or added connections
- The process for replacing the well or relocating equipment
- Responsibility when a participant does not pay or blocks access
- How the arrangement continues when any participating property is sold
A verbal statement that neighbors have shared the well for years does not establish a durable right to enter another property, operate equipment, or demand water after ownership changes. Any severed groundwater interest, shared ownership, off-property source, or unclear easement should be reviewed through the title process and, when needed, by a Texas attorney familiar with water and real-property rights.
Locate Every Water Well on the Tract
The working household well may not be the only well on the property. Older farm and ranch tracts can contain inactive livestock wells, former windmill wells, hand-dug wells, test holes, irrigation wells, or casings hidden by vegetation and later improvements.
Field Signs of an Old or Unused Well
- Steel, plastic, brick, or concrete casing extending from the ground
- A windmill base, abandoned pump house, or disconnected electrical equipment
- A covered opening, concrete ring, pipe stub, or unexplained depression
- Old livestock watering equipment or a line leading to a former trough
- A capped casing that does not appear on the seller’s disclosure or survey
- An open hole or deteriorated cover that could admit runoff or create a fall hazard
Abandoned and deteriorated wells can provide a direct route for surface contaminants to reach groundwater. The landowner of record is responsible for plugging the well or bringing it into compliance under Texas requirements.[Abandoned well duty]
Before closing, identify who will evaluate the well, obtain a plugging estimate if needed, and document any agreed work. A casual cover placed over an opening is not the same as a compliant cap or a properly completed plugging operation.
Evaluate Water Quantity Beyond Faucet Pressure
Household pressure and well production are different measurements. A pressure tank can supply a strong initial flow even when the well recovers slowly. The useful question is whether the complete system can sustain the buyer’s expected demand without excessive drawdown, air entry, sediment, pump cycling, or loss of pressure.
Well Performance Review
A qualified well or pump professional should evaluate the accessible wellhead, sanitary seal or cap, casing condition, site drainage, electrical controls, pressure tank, pressure switch, pump behavior, visible piping, leaks, and freeze protection. The review should also address:
- Static water level before sustained pumping
- Pumping level and drawdown during the test
- Flow delivered after stored pressure has been used
- Recovery after pumping stops
- Sediment, air, discoloration, odor, or pressure fluctuation during extended use
- The age, depth, placement, and replacement history of the pump
- Past performance during late summer, drought, or periods of heavy irrigation
- Storage tanks, booster pumps, hauled-water connections, or other equipment used to compensate for limited production
The test duration and acceptable result should be selected for the well, aquifer conditions, dwelling, and intended use. A household with irrigation, livestock, guest quarters, or several simultaneous users may need a different assessment than a small residence with limited outdoor demand.
Test the Water for Property-Specific Risks
Texas does not regulate the water quality of an individual private well in the same manner as a public water system. The well owner is responsible for testing and addressing water-quality problems. The Texas Water Development Board directs owners to accredited drinking-water laboratories and provides tools for reviewing water-quality data by county, aquifer, or well.[Testing responsibility]
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends testing private well water at least annually for total coliform bacteria, nitrate, total dissolved solids, and pH. It also recommends choosing additional tests according to local land use, geology, nearby pollution sources, and household circumstances.[Testing scope]
| Property Condition | Tests to Discuss | What the Result May Clarify |
|---|---|---|
| Every private drinking-water well | Total coliform, nitrate, total dissolved solids, and pH | Basic sanitary condition and broad water-quality characteristics |
| Positive coliform result or sewage concern | E. coli or other laboratory-recommended confirmation | Whether fecal contamination may be present and immediate response is needed |
| Cropland, fertilizer, or livestock nearby | Nitrate, bacteria, and locally used pesticides or herbicides | Possible agricultural or animal-waste influence |
| Fuel tanks, repair shops, disposal sites, or industrial history | Volatile organic compounds and site-specific petroleum-related compounds | Whether fuel or solvent contamination requires further investigation |
| Older plumbing or unexplained staining | Lead, copper, iron, manganese, hardness, and corrosivity-related parameters | Whether the issue begins in the well, treatment system, or household plumbing |
| Known local geological concern | Arsenic, fluoride, radium, other radionuclides, or minerals identified by local records | Whether naturally occurring constituents affect drinking or treatment decisions |
| Flooding, well repair, or damaged wellhead | Bacteria and contaminants connected to the surrounding land use | Whether surface water or disturbed materials may have entered the well |
Separate Raw Water From Treated Water
A softener, reverse-osmosis unit, chlorinator, iron filter, sediment filter, or other treatment device can change the water delivered at the kitchen faucet. When feasible, compare a properly collected raw-water sample with a sample taken after treatment. This can show whether a constituent originates in the aquifer, enters through the well system, or is being controlled by equipment that will require continued service.
Do not rely on taste, odor, color, a home test strip, or an old laboratory report. Some contaminants produce no obvious sensory change, and water conditions can change after flooding, well repairs, nearby land disturbance, or prolonged drought.
Verify the Septic System’s Legal Status
An OSSF permit file should be compared with the equipment and disposal area found on the property. The file may include an application, site evaluation, approved planning materials, design drawings, installation record, final inspection, authorization to operate, maintenance documents, and later repair approvals.
Permitted, Grandfathered, or Exempt
Texas generally requires a permit and approved plan to construct, install, alter, extend, or repair an OSSF. A system may be treated as grandfathered when it predates the applicable authorized local program or September 1, 1989, whichever is earlier, and it is not causing a nuisance, in need of repair, materially altered, or subject to a substantial increase in use. The local permitting authority should confirm the status rather than relying on a seller’s description.[Existing system status]
The 10-Acre Rule Does Not Remove All OSSF Requirements
A tract measuring at least 10 acres is not automatically free from septic regulation. TCEQ states that the permit exemption requires compliance with the remaining planning, construction, and installation standards, a site evaluation by a licensed site evaluator or professional engineer, one single-family dwelling on the tract, on-property effluent disposal, no nuisance or groundwater pollution, and every part of the OSSF at least 100 feet from the property line. The local authority may apply additional requirements.[10-acre conditions]
A seller’s statement that the system is “exempt because the land is over 10 acres” should be supported by the site evaluation, property configuration, system location, dwelling count, and written confirmation from the responsible authority.
Match the Inspection to the OSSF Type
Texas OSSF selection is based on a site evaluation that considers soil texture, fractured rock, groundwater depth, restrictive layers, slope, flood conditions, and the proposed treatment and disposal method. An existing system should therefore be judged against its approved design and site conditions, not against a generic description of a septic tank.[Site evaluation]
Conventional Gravity Systems
The inspection should identify the tank, inlet and outlet condition, accessible baffles, distribution components, drainfield location, surface drainage, evidence of ponding, sewage odor, unusually wet soil, backup, and vegetation patterns that may indicate excess effluent. The inspector should determine whether driveways, barns, patios, additions, or heavy vehicle routes have been placed over the tank or disposal area.
Aerobic Treatment and Surface Application
An aerobic treatment unit adds mechanical and electrical components. Review the aerator, dosing pump, floats, alarms, control panel, disinfection method, spray heads or drip components, effluent distribution, electrical service, and maintenance reports. Local authorities may require maintenance arrangements or homeowner training beyond the state minimum.[Maintenance rule]
Pressure-Dosed, Drip, and Other Designs
Low-pressure dosing, drip irrigation, mound, lined evapotranspiration, and other designs may have been selected because a conventional drainfield was unsuitable. Verify the filtration, dosing, pressure distribution, disposal boundaries, soil cover, pumps, controls, and maintenance duties that apply to the approved design.
Inspection Access and Pumping
The evaluator should be able to identify and access the components needed for the agreed inspection scope. Ask whether tank pumping is required to inspect the structure, baffles, liquid levels, or accumulated solids. A recent pumping receipt documents a service event, but it does not establish that the drainfield accepts effluent properly or that the complete system is correctly sized.
Compare Approved Capacity With Actual Use
The approved plan should be compared with the current dwelling and the buyer’s intended use. Investigate enclosed garages, converted offices, loft sleeping areas, additions, guest houses, accessory dwelling units, barn apartments, recreational vehicle connections, workshop restrooms, short-term rental use, and other changes that may increase wastewater flow.
- Does the approved dwelling configuration match the house represented in the listing?
- Were additions and plumbing changes included in a later OSSF approval?
- Does the disposal area remain fully within the property and required easements?
- Is there usable land for repair or replacement if the existing disposal area fails?
- Would a planned pool, barn, driveway, addition, or second dwelling interfere with the approved system?
- Would subdivision leave the well or any part of the OSSF too close to a new property line?
- Can the electrical service and maintenance obligations support the installed treatment method?
A system that serves the present occupants without visible trouble may still be unsuitable for a larger household or a planned change in use. Obtain the local authority’s answer before treating a future bedroom, guest unit, commercial activity, or property division as feasible.
Measure the Well–Septic Relationship on the Survey and Ground
Texas well guidance identifies a minimum separation of 50 feet between a well and a septic tank, 100 feet between a well and a drainfield or spray area when applicable construction specifications are met, and 50 feet between a well and an adjacent property line. Local requirements and site conditions may call for greater separation.[Separation distance]
Horizontal distance is only one part of the site review. Groundwater movement, slope, runoff, soil permeability, well depth, casing condition, nearby septic density, and flood exposure can change contamination risk. A failing or poorly located septic system can allow wastewater contaminants to reach a private well, particularly when the well is shallow, downgradient, damaged, or surrounded by permeable soil.[Contamination pathway]
Mark the Utility Layout
The survey, approved OSSF plan, well report, and field observations should be used to mark:
- Every active, inactive, capped, plugged, or unidentified well
- The septic tank, treatment unit, pump tanks, and access openings
- The drainfield, spray area, drip field, mound, or other disposal area
- Property lines, utility easements, access easements, and shared-use areas
- Homes, barns, workshops, pools, driveways, parking areas, and livestock facilities
- Creeks, ponds, drainage paths, flood-prone depressions, and steep breaks in slope
- Fuel tanks, chemical storage, former dumps, and other possible contamination sources
- Areas reserved for additions, replacement disposal, or future subdivision
Measure from the actual components rather than from a seller’s estimated location. If the tank or disposal field cannot be located, the uncertainty should be resolved before planning additions or accepting the system as properly placed.
Regional Conditions Change the Due-Diligence Questions
Broad Texas region names do not replace a parcel-level site evaluation, but they help identify questions that deserve attention.
- Hill Country and the Edwards Plateau: Ask for documented soil depth, fractured-rock conditions, slope, recharge-zone restrictions where applicable, and the reason the approved disposal method was selected.
- Gulf Coast, Coastal Bend, and low-lying East Texas tracts: Review flood history, shallow-groundwater conditions, drainage, hurricane or storm inundation, wellhead elevation, and disposal-field saturation after heavy rain.
- Blackland Prairie and other clay-heavy areas: Confirm how restrictive soil, shrink-swell movement, drainage, and wet-season conditions affected the OSSF design.
- Piney Woods and Post Oak Savannah: Examine runoff paths, nearby surface water, tree-root intrusion, seasonal wetness, and differences between sandy and clay soil layers.
- High Plains, Trans-Pecos, Permian Basin, and other dry western areas: Give added attention to well recovery, pump depth, drought history, irrigation demand, mineral content, salinity, and the cost of obtaining an alternative supply.
- Rapidly developing rural edges of the Texas Triangle and Metroplex: Check whether nearby subdivision, utility expansion, new wells, road projects, annexation, or changed tract boundaries affect easements, well spacing, or future OSSF options.
Groundwater quality can vary within the same county and aquifer. Nearby well reports and county-level water-quality information can provide context, but they do not replace a sample from the well serving the property.
Know the Limits of a Standard Texas Home Inspection
When private wells and private sewage disposal systems are included in a TREC inspection, the standards require specified observations and functional checks. They do not require the inspector to establish long-term water-source reliability, locate underground well leaks, excavate the septic system, or determine the septic system’s size, adequacy, efficiency, or construction type.[Inspection scope]
Under those standards, a well inspection can include simultaneous operation of fixtures, a recommendation for coliform testing, identification of pump and storage equipment, observation of pressure and flow, and review of accessible wellhead conditions. The inspector is not required to open or remove well components or determine whether the source will remain dependable.
For a private sewage system, the minimum inspection can address system type, known disposal-field location, proximity to specified site features, visible or detectable effluent, functional flow, accessible components, pumps, aerators, drainage, and aerobic discharge. That scope does not replace a permit-file review or a specialized assessment designed to evaluate tank condition, approved capacity, disposal performance, and repair options.
Use the Contract Period in the Right Order
- Collect seller disclosures and utility records. Request the water-rights disclosure, standard property disclosure, well reports, GCD records, OSSF permit file, service history, shared agreements, survey, title documents, and invoices.
- Identify the responsible authorities. Confirm the GCD and OSSF permitting authority using the parcel address and legal description.
- Compare the records with the land. Locate the well, pressure equipment, treatment devices, septic components, disposal area, easements, property lines, and all later improvements.
- Schedule the appropriate specialists. Define in writing what the home inspector, well professional, laboratory, septic evaluator, surveyor, title company, and other professionals will examine.
- Test sustained water performance. Evaluate pressure, flow, drawdown, recovery, pump behavior, storage, and expected demand rather than relying on a short faucet test.
- Collect laboratory samples correctly. Use the laboratory’s containers and handling instructions. Add site-specific contaminants to the baseline panel when the property history or local conditions justify them.
- Inspect the OSSF against its approved design. Compare the installed system, dwelling configuration, disposal boundaries, maintenance records, and visible condition with the permit file.
- Investigate conflicting evidence. Resolve differences among the listing, seller disclosure, map records, field locations, survey, laboratory results, and permit documents.
- Obtain written repair scopes and estimates. Separate a small component repair from a well replacement, treatment dependency, permit correction, drainfield failure, or water-rights problem.
- Confirm future plans before relying on them. Ask the controlling authority about additions, guest houses, pools, workshops, livestock use, irrigation, subdivision, and replacement-system space.
Classify the Findings Before Negotiation
| Finding | What It May Mean | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
| Complete records, acceptable tests, and systems matching the approved layout | Lower documentation and performance uncertainty | Review normal maintenance duties and proceed under the contract terms |
| Minor pump, pressure, alarm, lid, or spray-head defect | A defined repair may restore operation | Obtain a licensed repair scope, cost, completion record, and retest when appropriate |
| Well report or permit file missing | Construction, approval, or capacity remains uncertain | Search state and local records, identify the physical system, and obtain authority guidance |
| Low recovery or unstable sustained flow | The source may not meet expected demand | Extend testing and price storage, pump changes, rehabilitation, a replacement well, or another supply |
| Bacteria or chemical result outside the selected standard | The source, well construction, plumbing, treatment, or nearby land use needs investigation | Limit exposure as advised, confirm the result, identify the cause, and obtain a corrective plan |
| Unrecorded shared well or off-property source | Water access may depend on another owner | Resolve ownership, easement, operating agreement, and title questions before closing |
| Unidentified or abandoned well | The buyer may inherit plugging, safety, and contamination duties | Have the well classified and obtain a compliant capping, repair, or plugging plan |
| Surface effluent, backup, saturated field, or recurring alarm | The OSSF may be malfunctioning or overloaded | Obtain specialist findings, authority requirements, repair design, and realistic site-restoration costs |
| System does not match the permit or current dwelling | Alteration, capacity, or approval issues may exist | Request written direction from the permitting authority before accepting a repair or credit |
| No viable replacement area or conflicting future construction | Property use may be permanently constrained | Reconsider the intended project and obtain engineering, survey, and authority review |
What Should Be in the Closing File
Private Well File
- Water-rights disclosure and related attachments
- Applicable title exceptions and water-rights documents
- Shared-well or off-property supply agreement
- Recorded access and utility easements
- State well report matched to the physical well
- GCD registration, permit, or exemption confirmation
- Current well and pump inspection findings
- Sustained flow and recovery information
- Current accredited laboratory results
- Treatment-equipment condition and service records
- Identification of every inactive or abandoned well
- Repair, plugging, or replacement documents required by the transaction
OSSF File
- Permit, exemption, or grandfathered-status confirmation
- Approved plan, site evaluation, and as-built drawing
- Final approval or authorization record
- System type, design flow, and approved dwelling information
- Tank, treatment unit, and disposal-area locations
- Pumping, inspection, testing, and repair history
- Maintenance contract or service-policy records where applicable
- Alarm, aerator, pump, disinfection, and distribution findings
- Comparison of approved design with current structures and plumbing
- Written repair requirements and completed-work records
- Evaluation of replacement space and planned future improvements
Final Property Verification
Do not close with unresolved differences about the number of wells, groundwater rights, source reliability, laboratory results, septic location, legal status, design capacity, or access for future repairs. Seller knowledge, database points, visible operation, and old service receipts each provide only part of the answer.
Groundwater district rules, OSSF requirements, local permits, inspection procedures, and transaction forms can change. Confirm the parcel-specific requirements with the applicable GCD, OSSF permitting authority, Texas agency record, laboratory, title professional, and qualified inspector before accepting repairs, waiving a contract right, or completing the purchase.
View agency records and testing standards
Agency Records and Verification Notes
The agency pages listed below were checked on July 28, 2026.
- ↩ TREC Seller’s Disclosure About Groundwater and Surface Water Rights — Supports “Water Disclosure Effective July 2026,” including the form name, Form 61-0 designation, effective date, and its purpose in reporting seller-known water-rights information.
- ↩ TREC Rules and Inspector Standards of Practice — Supplies the required well and private-sewage observations described in “Know the Limits of a Standard Texas Home Inspection.” It also defines the reliability, excavation, capacity, and efficiency determinations outside the required scope.
- ↩ TCEQ OSSF System Suitability and Site Evaluation — Supports “Match the Inspection to the OSSF Type” by connecting system suitability to soil texture, fractured rock, groundwater depth, restrictive horizons, slope, and flood conditions.
- ↩ TCEQ Maintenance of On-Site Sewage Facilities — Sets out the maintenance-provider and homeowner-maintenance context described under “Aerobic Treatment and Surface Application.” Local authorities may impose stricter conditions.
- Return to: well jurisdiction, separation distance — TWDB Groundwater and Private Water Well FAQ — Supports the GCD registration distinction, absence of a statewide minimum-acreage rule, new-well reporting context, and stated separation distances for wells, septic components, and adjacent property lines.
- ↩ TWDB Procedures for Locating a Water Well Report — Provides the pre-2003 and 2003-forward record paths used in “Locate a Missing Well Report,” along with the search fields needed to match a report to a property.
- ↩ TWDB Sampling a Private Water Well — Supports “Test the Water for Property-Specific Risks” by stating the owner’s role in addressing private-well water quality and identifying accredited drinking-water laboratories and Texas groundwater data tools.
- ↩ CDC Guidelines for Testing Well Water — Provides the annual total-coliform, nitrate, total-dissolved-solids, and pH recommendations and the locally selected contaminant categories used in the water-testing table.
- ↩ EPA Septic Systems and Drinking Water — Supports “Measure the Well–Septic Relationship on the Survey and Ground” by explaining how setback, groundwater flow, well depth, soil, system density, construction, and maintenance affect contamination risk.
- ↩ TDLR Technical Guidance on Abandoned or Deteriorated Water Wells — Supports “Locate Every Water Well on the Tract,” including the contamination and safety concerns and the landowner-of-record responsibility for plugging or bringing a well into compliance.
